You’ll see plenty written about this decision so I won’t go into any redundant detail. To put it bluntly, the Keays decision surprises me. Employers may call this decision a victory, but quite frankly, I don’t know of too many employment counsel that would advise their client’s to behave in the manner that Honda did. […]
I can’t resist it. The tempest in a coffee cup. Grounds for … Okay I’ll shutup. See, Klopfenstein v. National Sales Supply, a Pennsylvania District Court decision holding that the boss’ demands to serve coffee do not constitute grounds for a discrimination suit in the employment context.
The OCP and Zoning Bylaw Amendment for the 1400 Block of Bewicke Avenue in the City of North Vancouver were recently amended. The change seemed to be contentious and raised at least a few eyebrows. Anyone interested in reviewing those amendments should give me a call and I’d be pleased to take a look at […]
This case deals with a real estate agent discipline hearing and judicial review. The discipline committee and the appeal body, the Financial Services Tribunal, both made the error of relying on the old repealed statute that had formerly governed the issue at hand. An attempt was made to rectify the problem by re-considering the original […]
Bill 42 has gotten a few of us a little worked up. See the offending language here. In Particular: 66 The following sections are added to Division 2: Third party advertising limits 235.1 (1) In respect of a general election conducted in accordance with section 23 (2) of the Constitution Act, an individual or organization […]