Gulkison v. Vancouver Police Board, 2014 BCSC 669 , concerns liability of the Board of Police Commissioners for actions of City of Vancouver Police Department members. Justice Burnyeat held that the Vancouver Police Board is liable for any liabilities or damages that may be attributed to the Board of Police Commissioners for the actions of a police officer.
Rhebergen v. Creston Veterinary Clinic Ltd., 2014 BCCA 97 concerns a form of post-employment non-competition agreement. These types of agreements being in the nature of a restraint on trade must be reasonable. Courts will hold overbroad conditions unenforceable. Be careful with restrictions you place on the departing employee’s ability to work. If the area that you don’t want the employee to work in is too large, or the duration of the limitation is too long or there is a large financial penalty placed on the employee you will have a problem enforcing the non-compete agreement.
2013 BCSC 1224 Vancouver City v. Robinson concerns damage caused by diesel exhaust from equipment operated by The City of Vancouver. The case deals with the law of nuisance and the City’s defence of statutory authorization. This basic defence says that if the act is authorized by statute then inevitable consequences from that act are also authorized and cannot be the basis for a nuisance damage claim
Vivendi Canada Inc. v. Dell’Aniello indicates that post-retirement benefit reductions are suitable matters for class actions.
This will be of interest to the Realtors®, mortgage brokers, strata owners and bad tenants. In short if the folks living in the unit misbehave enough, the court will entertain and apply the available remedies including:
1. an order to behave and comply with bylaws;
2. an order compelling payment of monetary penalties;
3. an eviction order;
4. contempt proceedings; and finally,
5. an order forcing the sale of the strata unit.
2013 BCCA 206 The Owners Strata Plan LMS 2768 v. Jordison, has the BC Court of Appeal confirming a court ordered sale of a strata unit on the basis of section 173 of the Strata Property Act, the unit owner and occupants’ repeated bylaw breaches, failure to pay significant penalties, contempt of a court order in that regard, general obnoxious behavior and as a last resort when all else failed.
The strata was given conduct of sale.
It took a lot to get to that point, including numerous court attendances and proceedings. Having said that, this case makes clear that the Strata Act allows for a forced sale as a possible remedy to a problem owner and tenant.