{"id":831,"date":"2019-10-23T10:46:11","date_gmt":"2019-10-23T18:46:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/?p=831"},"modified":"2019-10-23T10:47:42","modified_gmt":"2019-10-23T18:47:42","slug":"human-rights-document-request-arguably-relevant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/?p=831","title":{"rendered":"Human Rights Document Request: Arguably Relevant"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Source: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/bc\/bchrt\/doc\/2019\/2019bchrt197\/2019bchrt197.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAMbXVuaWNpcGFsaXR5AAAAAAE&amp;resultIndex=16\">2019 BCHRT 197 (CanLII) | CanLII<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Documents requested in a human rights matter must be arguably relevant.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[18]           The test to be applied in an application under Rule 23(1) is whether a document may be relevant or arguably relevant, with the onus on the applicant to show some nexus between the document and a fact in issue: Brady v Interior Health Authority 2005 BCHRT 200 (CanLII) and Gichuru v The Law Society of British Columbia 2007 BCHRT 176 (CanLII). In Brady, the Tribunal stated at para. 53 that \u201cthe threshold is not a high one; there must be some nexus between the documents and a fact in issue. In order to decide whether the requested documents may be relevant, I must first look at the complaint and the response to the complaint to determine the facts in issue in the case.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Source: 2019 BCHRT 197 (CanLII) | CanLII Documents requested in a human rights matter must be arguably relevant. [18] The test to be applied in an application under Rule 23(1) is whether a document may be relevant or arguably relevant, with the onus on the applicant to show some nexus between the document and a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4,2,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-employment-law","category-human-rights-law","category-labour-law","category-litigation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/831\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}