{"id":109,"date":"2006-06-14T17:35:29","date_gmt":"2006-06-15T01:35:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/?p=109"},"modified":"2006-06-14T17:37:21","modified_gmt":"2006-06-15T01:37:21","slug":"commercial-arbitration-act-no-reinstatement-jurisdiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/?p=109","title":{"rendered":"Commercial Arbitration Act: No Reinstatement Jurisdiction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.gov.bc.ca\/Jdb-txt\/CA\/06\/02\/2006BCCA0273.htm\"><em>Randhawa v. The Pepsi Bottling Group (Canada) Co.<\/em><\/a>, 2006 BCCA 273, is an interesting case concerning a dismissal arbitration under the BC <em>Commercial Arbitration Act<\/em>. The BC Court of Appeal confirmed that the Arbitrator did not have jurisdiction to order a reinstatement of the employee in the arbitration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Randhawa v. The Pepsi Bottling Group (Canada) Co., 2006 BCCA 273, is an interesting case concerning a dismissal arbitration under the BC Commercial Arbitration Act. The BC Court of Appeal confirmed that the Arbitrator did not have jurisdiction to order a reinstatement of the employee in the arbitration.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-employment-law","category-labour-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/schenklaw.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}