<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Schenk &#038; Associates</title>
	<link>http://schenklaw.ca</link>
	<description>Focused. Legal Solutions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:56:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>

	<item>
		<title>Dismissal Just Cause for Defamatory Letter to Shareholders</title>
		<description>	Chen v. Sable Fish Canada Inc., 2010 BCSC 444, deals with the matter of one unhappy employee that got himself fired for airing the company&#8217;s dirty laundry to no less than the shareholders. The case makes clear that a degree of criticism of management is acceptable but when that criticism ...</description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=226</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Employment Law: Independent Contractor or Employee</title>
		<description>	A sometimes thorny issue (aren&#8217;t they all all?) is whether the dismissed individual is an employee or an independent contractor. The issue has been recently adressed in McKee v. Reid&#8217;s Heritage Homes Ltd. , 2009 ONCA 916 (CanLII) (Ontario) and in Smith v. Centra Windows Ltd.  , 2009 BCSC ...</description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=225</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wrongful Dismissal Reasonable Notice for Senior Older Employees</title>
		<description>	Palmer v. Clemco Industries Inc., 2010 BCSC 230 deals with the dismissal of two older, senior management level employees.
	Employee 1: 60 years old, 14 year employee, service manager for a restaurant grease trap bio-remediator. 15 months reasonable notice.
	Employee 2: Similar age and responsibility as an office manager. 11 month notice.

 </description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=224</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BC Court of Appeal Upholds 15 Month Wrongful Dismissal Award</title>
		<description>	Chapple v. Umberto Management Ltd.     ,  2009 BCCA 571, deals with the employment dismissal of a 38 year old, 13.5 year employed restaurant manager at one of Umberto&#8217;s Whistler locations. Including gratuities and tips her income was roughly $120,000.00 per year. The case is worth ...</description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=223</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Employment Contract Frustration</title>
		<description>	The doctrine of contract frustration deals with situations where a party cannot meet their obligations under a contract due to some non-culpable event. In the case of employment contracts the situation often arises where an employee becomes ill or disabled to the extent that they can&#8217;t perform their job anymore ...</description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=222</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Yes You Can Complain to The Human Rights Tribunal</title>
		<description>	A very common issue that arises in administrative law: more than one body can hear,  rule and decide on a matter. The follow up issue  arises: which body should run that process. Further, once you have an answer from one body, does that preclude another body from taking ...</description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=221</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Liability Resulting From North Vancouver Land Slide</title>
		<description>	
See Perrault v. North Vancouver (District), 2010 BCSC 182, for a discussion on liability for the District of North Vancouver and the realtors involved in the sale and purchase of the property.

 </description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=220</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Maternity Leave and Reasonable Notice for Employment Termination</title>
		<description>	In case it wasn&#8217;t obvious, reasonable notice periods are suspended by maternity leave. Don&#8217;t terminate your pregnant employees or employees that are on maternity leave. See the following cases:
	Whelehan v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Ltd.
	Winterburn v. Domtar Inc.,  2002 BCSC 1418
	 Wells v. Patina Salons Ltd.,  2003 BCSC 1731

 </description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=218</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>No Statutory Cause of Action in Employment Standards Act</title>
		<description>	Macaraeg v. E Care Contact Centers Ltd., 2008 BCCA 182, deals with the issue of whether rights under the Employment Standards Act can form the basis of a civil action. Answer: no.
	Mr. Justice Chiasson states for the Court:
	Summary
	[100]        In my view, the learned ...</description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=217</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Defamation in the Workplace</title>
		<description>	M.D.A. Marine Design Associates Ltd. v. British Columbia Ferry Services Inc., 2008 BCSC 1432, lays out a great professional reputation defamation analysis applicable to contract and employment scenarios.

 </description>
		<link>http://schenklaw.ca/?p=215</link>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
